Queen Mary UCU sends its solidarity and support to students exercising their right to peaceful protest by occupying the Octagon in the Queens Building. These students have occupied this space in protest against cuts to student bursaries and staff pensions. The student body has shown incredible support and solidarity to striking UCU members in the past three weeks, as attested by student participation on picket lines, the 2500+ petition signatures gathered in the first week of strikes, and the motion passed by QMSU. As a branch, we have voted to support students in their campaign to reverse cuts to student bursaries, which will damage the prospects of some of our most disadvantaged students. As staff, we recognise the vital role that bursaries play in supporting the diverse, vibrant and academically successful student community at QMUL. We view the struggles against cuts to both pensions and bursaries as linked to a wider trend towards the marketisation of the sector and we recognise a shared interest between staff and students in resisting this.

In response to her recent communication to all staff, the committee has written to the Vice Principal for Teaching, Learning and Student Experience on this matter demanding clarifications and the reversal of bursary cuts. This letter is attached. Furthermore, we call on QMUL management to respect the right to peaceful protest on campus by allowing free access to the Octagon during the occupation. In the interests of the wellbeing of the occupying students, we call for the regular supply of electricity and heating to the building to be maintained, and for unhindered access to food, water, and bathroom facilities to be granted. Finally, we urge the university management in the strongest possible terms to refrain from any use of security personnel to harass the occupying students and to refrain from involving the police in this matter.
Please follow the occupation and tweet messages of solidarity to @qmoccupy #occupytheoctagon.


UPDATE 1: Students have managed to obtain two reports commissioned by senior managers, which we publish here in the interests of proper transparency: 1)Undergraduate Student Finance Survey 2016: Results and Analysis; 2) Impact of Financial Assistance Measures on Progression. (NB: large PDFs.)

UPDATE 2: Bethany Pickering, the QMSU officer who has led the bursaries campaign and is involved in the occupation, has written her own response to Professor Lingwood’s message to staff.


Dear Professor Lingwood,

I write to you on behalf of the QM UCU branch committee.

We note your communication to all staff on Monday 12th March in response to widespread concern at cuts to student bursaries. As you will be aware, a QMUCU branch meeting passed a unanimous motion in support of the student campaign to reverse these cuts. We have also issued a statement of support and solidarity with the students who are currently occupying the Octagon.

We have grave concerns about the impact that the cuts to student bursaries will have. While we recognise and welcome the increased support available to students with the lowest shared parental incomes, we note with concern the proposed cut to bursaries for students with shared parental incomes of above £15,000 pa. We believe that this cut cannot but have a deleterious effect on the attainment, engagement, and wellbeing of these students. This decision is all the more troubling against the backdrop of central government cuts to maintenance grants.

We know from firsthand experience as educational professionals that students with lower family incomes are often less engaged and less able to concentrate on their studies because they are required to work part-time, to live away from Central London, and/or to care for family members. We are concerned that these cuts will exacerbate these issues. We are also concerned about the wider equality and diversity implications of this decision, especially on the diversity of the student body and the existing attainment gaps.

We are therefore writing to call on you to urgently review and reverse this decision. In order to promote transparency and open debate on this matter, we also request answers to the following questions:

  1. Please can you release a copy of the research commissioned that underpinned this decision and the minutes of the meetings where this issue was discussed and decided?
  2. Is it true that QMSU representatives were required to maintain confidentiality in order to participate in these meetings? If so, what was the rationale?
  3. What was the total budget for widening participation in cash terms in 2016/17, 2017/18, and 2018/19?
  4. What proportion of the total budget for widening participation in 2017/18 was used specifically for bursaries? What proportion is being used for this specific purpose in 2018/19?
  5. What proportion of the budget is now being spent on “rais[ing] aspirations of school students from under-represented backgrounds to go to university” and what concrete activities does this involve?
  6. What proportion of the budget is now being used on “other forms of support”, and what concretely does this involve?
  7. What proportion of the budget is now being used to support the “QMUL model”?
  8. How does the university propose to mitigate the likely effect of these cuts on student attainment, engagement and wellbeing?
  9. What steps has the university taken to monitor and mitigate the equalities implications of these cuts, specifically in relation to the diversity of the student body and attainment gaps?

Given the widespread interest in this matter, we are also sharing this letter with our members.


QMUCU branch committee

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s